Women Are Watching

Blog Subscribe to our feed

Guest post from ground zero in the fight against Ohio's abortion ban

Guest post from ground zero in the fight against Ohio's abortion ban

| Gabriel M.

My home state of Ohio is on the verge of passing what is currently the most extreme abortion ban in the country. If the bill passes, abortion care would be outlawed so early in pregnancy that it may be illegal before a woman even knows she’s pregnant.

The bill easily passed the House this summer, but it was stalled for months in the Senate.

After an airplane circled the statehouse asking legislators to pass the bill now — during the very last days of session, when more than half a million Ohioans are unemployed — the Senate is turning its attention to this bill. The result is nothing short of a circus.

In the spring, the House was presented with what proponents publicized as “testimony from the fetus:

“To convince the state House Health Committee of the bill’s merits, activists recruited the youngest witness ever to ‘testify’: a nine-week-old fetus. Unfortunately for the group, the sideshow failed, since the fetus’ heartbeat was pretty much undetectable.

Several months later, with the bill now before the state Senate, Republicans brought in the nine-week-old baby that has developed from the fetal ‘witness’ to act as a ‘silent witness.'"

In the Senate, things have certainly not calmed down, and the gimmicks are back. During last Thursday’s hearing, a baby was brought out to “re-testify.” All of this might be merely cute as opposed to offensive, if not for the fact that grown women opposed to the bill were prohibited from testifying.

So, to recap — a months-old baby was an “expert” witness, and women whose rights would be severely curtailed were denied an opportunity to speak.

Meanwhile, everyone on all sides admits that this is an unconstitutional proposal. The proponents are on record as wanting to use this to reverse Roe v. Wade. I think Ohioans would agree that this is not the time to spend unknown amounts of cash on a legal battle over cruel legislation.

Even so, we expect additional hearings tomorrow and Wednesday, with the Senate potentially set to vote Wednesday. And Thursday, legislators go home for the year having ignored what most Ohioans actually care about.

Governor Kasich, when faced with an $8 billion budget shortfall earlier this year, chose to balance the next budget on the backs of workers and attack their collective bargaining rights. Voters have already rebuked him for that broad overreach at the polls this past November.

Now it’s time for Ohioans to speak out against government overreach again.

Newspapers from around the state, even more conservative ones, are roundly condemning the legislation. On Friday , the conservative Cincinnati Enquirer published an editorial on the bill. Their take, “Now’s not the time” for the bill, which “is not only unlikely to prevail but poorly thought out, unworkable and divisive.” Just yesterday , the Toledo Blade reinforced their opposition to the bill, calling it “simply bad law. It is a political and ideological statement masquerading as public policy.”

If you’re in Ohio, please call the Chairman of the Ohio Senate Health, Human Services and Aging Committee, Sen. Scott Oelslager, at (877)-810-9757. Ask him to stop wasting taxpayers’ time and money with this unconstitutional bill and go back to work trying to fix the state’s economy.

-Gabriel Mann is the e-organizer for Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Ohio Action Fund
 

(photo credit: Jim Bowen)

 

Author Bios



Comments (6)

02.16.12 @ 12:37PM | Ayumi

I often go to the Library of Congress to see who voted for or anagist particular bills. When I tried to check the record for this bill, there was no roll call. They did not keep a written record of the vote in the Senate or the House. I have never seen this. Does anyone know if that is legal?

12.16.11 @ 8:04AM | Elliptical workout

Strongly suggest adding a "google+" button for the blog!

12.15.11 @ 8:47AM | Heather H.

Hi Marianne--

Rather than a link, we provide a direct phone number for the committee chairman, since time was of the essence. Thank you for your support! As it turns out, the bill is not moving forward this month, which is good news, but we expect it to come back next year.
--Heather H. with Planned Parenthood Action Fund

12.14.11 @ 5:59PM | Marianne Schmits

Why don't you have a link to contact our Ohio senators on this issue???!!!!!!

12.13.11 @ 2:29PM | Megan

btw, the above email was sent to: SD29@senate.state.oh.us

12.13.11 @ 2:28PM | Megan

Dear Senator,

It is with dismay that I hear that the Ohio Senate, instead of spending time on creating a job friendly environment, or even just jobs, you people are spending time setting up the perfect environment for Ohio to spend money on a lawsuit that it will definitely lose.

Where are your priorities?!?!

1. Consent to sex does not equal consent to pregnancy.
2. More than just "whores" get abortions.
3. If you want to cut down on abortions, spend more money on sex education.
4. Consent to sex does not equal consent to pregnancy (I know I already stated this one).
5. Sex with contraception DEFINITELY states no consent to pregnancy.
6. If i were to leave my window open, it doesn't give a burglar the right to invade my space. I have just as much right to remove the unwanted burglar from my house as I do an unwanted person from my body. It's called self defense.
7. Removing a fetus from a woman's body and allowing it to die on the table because it cannot survive on its own outside of her is the same as a parent with a matching kidney not donating said kidney to their child, and the child dying as a result. The second one isn't against the law. Why should the first be?
8. Forced pregnancy is slavery. If you assume that a fetus has a "right to life", that civil right in no way outweighs a woman's right to not be enslaved to it. Forcing a woman to give her body to a fetus against her will is the exact same thing as forcing a person to give their body against their will to a slave owner.

Focus on jobs and not on a stupid bill that will cost the state of Ohio money that it doesn't have.

Post a Comment